Tea Party Excess Threatens High-Tech Success

In my latest Roll Call column, I point out that the Tea Party’s political tactics are threatening our nation’s scientific enterprise:

The government shutdown and threatened financial default may seem so yesterday, given the Obamacare rollout mess. But the tea party’s October call to conservative arms is having a persisting, pernicious effect, even though the media and Wall Street seem to have moved on.

What I have in mind, particularly, is the sequester’s impact on science, the generator of America’s future economic growth.

In the Senate, where a modicum of bipartisanship and sanity still remain, Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., has assumed the mantle of GOP leadership on innovation. His recent gutsy call for increased federal investments in research comes as his former South Carolina colleague, Jim DeMint, has been pressuring Republicans from his perch atop The Heritage Foundation to focus on taming the federal deficit to the exclusion of almost everything else.

The Heritage drumbeat has considerable traction in the House, where DeMint’s acolytes are inhibiting even the smallest attempts by Republican authorizers on the Science, Space and Technology Committee to address America’s flagging research enterprise.

Chairman Lamar Smith, R-Texas, should take a cue from the other Lamar and challenge the tea party to do battle over federal science spending. He might lose the initial skirmish, but he will come out the ultimate victor because the past is on his side.

Democrats believe they won a political victory by hanging tough and refusing to allow Texas Sen. Ted Cruz and his minions to gut the Affordable Care Act. And snapshots of public sentiment at the time put most of the blame for the government shutdown and the near-death experience of financial default squarely on Republicans.

But in the end, what Democrats really got was a three-month ceasefire in the battle between believers in government and scoffers who, apart from defending defense programs, see shrinking the federal enterprise as their principal Washington assignment. The deal leaves in place all the uncertainties that harm enterprises requiring certainty — innovation is one of them.

Apple’s outlook provides a good illustration of the looming danger. Ever since the death of Steve Jobs, the visionary founder of the Cupertino, Calif.-based company, Apple stock has been on a roller-coaster ride. From the day Tim Cook donned the mantle of CEO, analysts have been wondering if Apple’s gift of gold would soon follow Jobs into the grave. But in the long term, Washington, not just California, will hold the keys to Apple’s success.

The public may not know it, and Wall Street may not fully grasp it, but Jobs did not invent the technologies Apple uses today. Jobs’ genius was his uncanny ability to sense what devices the public would snap up and identify the existing technologies that would make the devices possible.

Even if Cook has the mustard to keep Apple’s innovation dynamo humming at the warp-speed standard Jobs set, he won’t be able to keep Apple dollars rolling in five or more years from now if the well of scientific discovery dries up. And that brings me back to the tea party fanatics and the damage their misguided cause is causing.

Applying a meat ax to the federal budget may be satisfying if your mission is to downsize and dismantle the federal government as quickly as possible. But the only cognoscenti who are applauding are our European and Asian competitors. They recognize the importance of scientific discovery. So do American economists, who estimate that fully 50 percent to 70 percent of U.S. gross domestic product growth ultimately stems from innovation, much of it federally inspired.

Government support of science, for example, delivered the integrated circuit, the atomic clock, the global positioning system, the Internet and the touch screen, the innovations Jobs seized on to create the iPhone and iPad. And the Apple saga is only one of many high-tech success stories hidden in plain sight.

As World War II drew to a close, the federal government began pouring money into an arcane field known as quantum mechanics. One of the outcomes was the laser, which now enables technologies accounting for more than a third of our economy.

Until recently, federal support of research knew no partisan boundaries. But today, tea party firebrands, who have been using the House of Representatives for their personal target practice, have broken that bipartisan bond and are threatening to undermine America’s science-driven economic engine. If they get their way, morning in America may soon become mourning in America.

Michael S. Lubell is the Mark W. Zemansky professor of physics at the City College of the City University of New York and director of public affairs of the American Physical Society.

 

2 Comments

  1. Paul Fajkowski
    Posted December 19, 2013 at 5:14 PM | Permalink | Reply

    Absurd article. It belongs on Huffington Post or some other bastion of left-wing lunacy, not on a serious scientific website.

    The Tea Party recognizes that government debt and spending are out of control, and are merely trying to rein in the excesses of a government that lacks accountablility, and apparently even basic math skills.

    Obviously, funding for scientific research is extremely important for the United States, militarily, medically and in development of comunications. No one can argue otherwise. The Tea Party wants money spent sensibly and Constitutionally. Reduced taxes mean free income for innovators like Alexander Graham Bell, Henry Ford and Steve Jobs to get free market enterprises off the ground.

    To speciously suggest, that the Tea Party is undermining scientific advance, because they are trying to avert an economic disaster is unjust at best, political chicanary at worst.

    It is tax loving, big government Democrats who caused the impasse by refusing to take seriously the dangerous state of US finances. When the US can no longer borrow money, when the debts come due, when we are forced to make truly draconian cuts merely to survive another generation it will be the fault of fools like Mr Lubell when there is no money for scientific research.

    • mslubell
      Posted February 12, 2014 at 1:25 PM | Permalink | Reply

      Mr. Fajkowski suggests that the Tea Party is trying to save the nation. I don’t doubt his sincerity or the sincerity of the Tea Party, for that matter. What I take issue with are the tactics and the selective application of the tactics. Two cases in point make my argument. First, regarding tactics, if Tea Partisans understand the importance of science, why do they embrace across-the-board budget reductions that eat away at R&D. Second, regarding selective application of tactics, why didn’t Tea Partisans clamor for either added revenue or spending offsets for fighting two wars in the last decade? Abs to conclude the suggestion that entrepreneurs like Steve Jobs need benefitted from a pro-business environment is certainly true, but Jobs and his ilk relied and continue to rely on the outcomes of federally funded research for the technologies they use in their products. Mr. Fajkowksi should try to escape the ideological shackles that seem to bind him.

Post a Comment

Required fields are marked *

*
*

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 38 other followers

%d bloggers like this: