<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: APS Commends President Obama&#8217;s FY 2011 Proposed Budget</title>
	<atom:link href="http://physicsfrontline.aps.org/2010/02/02/aps-commends-president-obamas-fy-2011-proposed-budget/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://physicsfrontline.aps.org/2010/02/02/aps-commends-president-obamas-fy-2011-proposed-budget/</link>
	<description>Your scientific source for news, analysis and commentary relating to physics, science and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 13:27:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tawanda</title>
		<link>http://physicsfrontline.aps.org/2010/02/02/aps-commends-president-obamas-fy-2011-proposed-budget/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tawanda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://physicsfrontline.aps.org/?p=296#comment-231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David, 

Since World War II, 50 percent of economic growth has been attributable to science and technology.  Furthermore,  every dollar invested in basic research translates into $40 in domestic growth, according to a study by the Council for Chemical Research.  Finally, industry has made it clear that Wall Street dynamics and tax codes make it impossible for the private sector to make long-term investments.

Best,
Tawanda]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, </p>
<p>Since World War II, 50 percent of economic growth has been attributable to science and technology.  Furthermore,  every dollar invested in basic research translates into $40 in domestic growth, according to a study by the Council for Chemical Research.  Finally, industry has made it clear that Wall Street dynamics and tax codes make it impossible for the private sector to make long-term investments.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Tawanda</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://physicsfrontline.aps.org/2010/02/02/aps-commends-president-obamas-fy-2011-proposed-budget/comment-page-1/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://physicsfrontline.aps.org/?p=296#comment-166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm.  I understand your point, but I would hardly call the giant deficits we will be running an incentive to economic growth.  Don&#039;t forget that we&#039;ll all be paying that back, with interest, and government borrowing also displaces private sector borrowing that could be used for, yes, R&amp;D research that would lead to scientific advancements and technological innovation.

Which is just to say that every dollar government spends is a dollar someone else can&#039;t.  And when it&#039;s a borrowed dollar, it actually comes to more than a dollar that someone else can&#039;t.

But I&#039;ll stop now because this is a physics blog, not an economics blog.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm.  I understand your point, but I would hardly call the giant deficits we will be running an incentive to economic growth.  Don&#8217;t forget that we&#8217;ll all be paying that back, with interest, and government borrowing also displaces private sector borrowing that could be used for, yes, R&amp;D research that would lead to scientific advancements and technological innovation.</p>
<p>Which is just to say that every dollar government spends is a dollar someone else can&#8217;t.  And when it&#8217;s a borrowed dollar, it actually comes to more than a dollar that someone else can&#8217;t.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;ll stop now because this is a physics blog, not an economics blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
