Lubell: Roll Call Column: Fix the Hollowing Out of the Supply Chain

Read Dr. Michael S. Lubell’s latest thought-provoking column for the Roll Call newspaper, which states why Apple and other high-tech companies are forced to manufacture their products overseas. In short, they have no choice:

” Even if Apple were willing to reduce its profits or increase its prices to accommodate American labor costs, it probably couldn’t build the iPad in the United States today. The supply chain and technical workforce Apple needs are no longer here.”

According to Dr. Lubell, the solution must be strengthening our nation’s innovation ecosystem — the driver of the American economy and job creation.

Read the entire column

LBNE cannot be funded with flat budget

Fermilab recently received bad news when Bill Brinkman, director of the Department of Energy’s Office of Science, wrote to lab officials explaining that the Long Baseline Neutrino Experiment (LBNE) could not be funded under current fiscal constraints.

In the letter, which you can read here, Brinkman explains that the LBNE is an exciting project that is important to science but it simply costs too much money at the moment.  Brinkman further requests that Fermilab scientists develop another plan to do the same science using a phased-in manner with incremental costs.

During recent testimony on Capitol Hill, members of the House Committee on Energy and Water repeatedly asked Brinkman for the Department of Energy’s (DOE) plan under a flat budget.  The committee expressed concern that DOE had not filed such a plan with the committee when it requested one.

During questioning, Brinkman admitted that DOE had worked on funding prioritization but conceded that further work was needed.  Moreover, he stated that it was difficult to find funds for costly experiments such as the LBNE and ITER.

But, he added, that DOE would work on it.

It appears the letter to FermiLab came as a response to intense scrutiny from the committee.  It’s also clear why the LBNE must transition to a phased-in paradigm.  However, DOE remains committed to finding a way forward as is evidenced by the continued financial support that keeps the Homestake Mine water pumps active.

Budget-cutting measures may result in other projects being cancelled, delayed and reprioritized in coming years.  And although the LBNE issue is a difficult hurdle to overcome for the particle physics community, alternatives to the current plan are being discussed.  LBNE scientists hope to have a new plan this summer, ensuring that the United States remains a global player in particle physics.

Deconstructing the iPad: How Federally Supported Research Leads to Game-Changing Innovation

William D. Phillips

Nobel Laureate and APS Member William D. Phillips explained how the GPS inside the iPad evolved from atomic clocks during a recent Capitol Hill briefing titled, “Deconstructing the iPad.”

The other speakers were Luis von Ahn, a Carnegie Mellon University professor and developer of the online authentication program, reCAPTCHA, and Martin Izzard, vice president at Texas Instruments.

By Michael Lucibella

Following the release of the iPad 3, speakers on Capitol Hill recently extolled the important role that federally funded basic scientific research plays in the foundation of future technological innovation. Industry leaders in technological innovation and a Nobel laureate disassembled a virtual iPad to show Congress the many ways federal research contributed to the popular device.

The Task Force on American Innovation, an advocacy organization promoting robust federal funding of scientific research, sponsored the event, along with the American Physical Society,  IEEE-USA, Computing Research Association, Materials Research Society, Texas Instruments and the American Chemical Society. The Task Force is composed of institutions of higher education, businesses, trade associations and scientific societies. APS is a founding member of the organization. The Task Force presented its first “Deconstructing the iPad” briefing to Capitol Hill staffers last year.

Before a standing-room only audience of congressional staffers and research funding advocates, the speakers made the case that the payoff from federal support of basic scientific research was worth the investment. Much of the technology in an iPad, including integrated circuits, the Internet, touch screens and GPS, can trace its origin to basic scientific research sponsored by the government.

“The iPad isn’t a culmination of technology; it’s a mile marker of a continuum of innovation that’s improving our quality of life all across the board,” said Luis von Ahn, a professor at Carnegie Mellon University and inventor of the online authentication program reCAPTCHA. “Federal support for early stage or basic research is truly an investment, which has a history of demonstrating extraordinary payoff in the explosion of new technologies that touch nearly every aspect of our life, and in economic terms, in the creation of millions of jobs.”

Nobel laureate William Phillips, a researcher at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), emphasized how federal funding is more important than ever for basic scientific research, filling holes left by private industry.

“The long- term stuff, the stuff that decades ago led to the things that we have today, is not being funded by industrial research labs anymore… Bell Labs, General Motors, Xerox, RCA all had really strong basic research laboratories. Those don’t exist anymore,” Phillips said. “We’ve had to rely on the federal government as the source of those kinds of funds.”

Phillips highlighted the iPad’s GPS unit as a technology developed by the U.S. military that evolved into a big industry. Even more fundamentally, he pointed to the government’s research into atomic clocks in the 1940s as the underlying technology that allows a GPS unit to work. The first atomic clock was built at the National Bureau of Standards (now NIST) in 1949 as a way to precisely measure time.

“When [Norman] Ramsey came up with this idea in 1949, nobody had any idea that you could make a global positioning system; it wasn’t even a gleam in somebody’s eye. Nobody was thinking along those lines,” Phillips said. “But it didn’t take long, once we had atomic clocks working, before people started to figure out all the wonderful things you can do with them.”

Technologies like the transistor, which forms the basis of today’s microchips, are also products of federally sponsored research. Vice President of Texas Instruments, Martin Izzard, highlighted the integrated circuit as something that began as an experiment in fundamental science years ago, but evolved into a crucial building block for most modern electronics.

“The integrated circuit itself and the microchip is something that, through now 50 years of staggering amounts of miniaturization and increased complexity, has brought us to the point where these integrated circuits can provide the functionality that you see in an iPad,” Izzard said.

NSF Science and Engineering Indicators a Great Resource

With exciting new interactive tools for comparing science and engineering data historically, on a map, or across states, the 2012 National Science Foundation’s Science and Engineering Indicators (SEI) are a great way to assess the current state of U.S. science and engineering.

The SEI measures the worldwide commitment to an innovation economy; how the U.S. allocates funding in science and engineering; and global trends in research and development.

Data presented in the biennial SEI has been an invaluable tool in identifying issues in the science and engineering fields. The SEI includes seven focus chapters, each with an incredible amount of information.

Some highlights include:

  • Five percent of the U.S. workforce is employed in a science and engineering occupation;
  • Workers in science and engineering fields have one third the unemployment compared with the general labor force;
  • Non-U.S. inventors account for more than half of all U.S. patents;
  • Although the recession halted growth, the U.S. still leads the world in high-tech manufacturing;
  • North America accounted for 36% of global R&D expenditures in 2009, down from 40% in 1996; and Asia/Pacific accounted for 35% in 2009, up from 23% in 1996.

Have you reviewed the 2012 Science and Engineering Indicators from the National Science Foundation?

Check them out: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind12/

College Students: Enter Video Contest Highlighting Innovations From Early Stage Scientific Research

Attention College Students:

The Task Force on American Innovation is sponsoring its second American Collegiate Video Contest to highlight the great innovations that stem from early stage scientific research. From the GPS to the Internet, American lives have been transformed by the myriad innovations that began years ago inside a scientific laboratory.

To enter the contest, click here.

U.S. Rep. Chaka Fattah: Government-backed scientific research key to America’s competitiveness

Everywhere we look, big questions are being asked and far-reaching answers have been forthcoming from research sponsored and underwritten by you and me and by every American. We all benefit from this multi-billion-dollar initiative that is, in aggregate, vital to our survival as a global community and critical to our advancement as Americans.

Read entire op-ed

President’s Budget Request Recognizes Importance of Science

Following the delay of President Obama’s budget request, there is now a framework in place for the upcoming debate on Fiscal Year 2013 (FY13) appropriations.  Congress will certainly not pass the budget as the President proposed it, but in recent years, funding for the sciences has tracked closely to the President’s initial request.

This year, the debate will be framed within the constraint of the Budget Control Act (BCA) and concerns about sequestrations stipulated in the legislation.  The debate on the FY13 budget is likely to continue throughout the election season as each political party strives for new seats in Congress to boost bargaining power.

To keep science funding steady, it is crucial that science supporters  advocate for increases to science accounts totaling more than 8% — a move that is necessary given that the BCA calls for reductions of 8% to any non-discretionary funding in the FY13 appropriations bills after they are passed.

Below is a summary of the proposed budget compared to FY12 appropriations:

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

The President requested $7.37B in FY13 for NSF, a proposed increase of $340M, or +4.8%, from $7.03B in FY12.

The research and related activities (R&RA) account would receive an increase of +4.5%, from 5.72B to $5.98B.  Education and human resources (EHR) would increase from $829M to $876M (+5.7%) and Major Research Equipment and Facilities Construction (MREFC) technically would receive an increase of ~$30M from FY12 appropriations levels, but due to transfers between accounts, would decline slightly from $197M to $196M.

The Mathematical and Physical Sciences (MPS) would receive an overall increase of +2.8%, from $1.31B in FY12 to $1.35B in FY13. However, much of the 2.8% increase would be delivered to areas other than physics. The Division of Physics would see a modest +1% increase from $277M in FY12 to $280M in FY13, but even that increase would be jeopardized by BCA’s sequestrations.

DOE Office of Science

The DOE Office of Science would receive a modest bump from $4.89B to $4.99B (+2%) in the President’s budget request.  The 2% increase would be focused mostly on Basic Energy Sciences (+6.6%) and Science Program Direction (+9.5%).  The sub-accounts of Fusion Energy Sciences (FES), High Energy Physics (HEP), and Nuclear Physics (NP) would see decreases, with FES declining from $401M in FY12 to $398M in FY13 (-0.7%), NP declining from $547M in FY12 to $527M in FY13 (-3.7%) and HEP slipping from $791M in FY12 to $777M FY13 (-1.8%).  The presidential request did not assign a high priority to the Long Baseline Neutrino Experiment (LBNE), providing only minimal funding that would allow it to “limp along,” in the words of John Holdren, the President’s science adviser.  By contrast, the presidential budget would provide $150M for ITER, $40.6M for the CEBAF 12 GeV upgrade, $22M for the Facility for Rare Isotope Beams (FRIB), $104M for NSLS-II and $63.5M for LCLS-II to advance these projects..

The President’s budget requested significant increases for the ARPA-E and EERE accounts, with ARPA-E to be funded at $350M in FY13 up from $275M in FY12, an increase of +27%, and EERE to be funded at $2.34B in FY13 up from $1.82B in FY12, an increase of +28%.

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

The President requested $4.91B in FY 2013 for NASA Science, a decrease of about $180M, or -3.6%, compared to FY 2012.

The overall reduction to NASA Science would be assigned mostly to the Planetary Science account, which would decline 21% from $1.5B inFY12 to $1.19B in FY13.  Astrophysics would see a 2% decrease from $672M to $659M.

Countering these decreases were requested increases in funding for the James Webb Space Telescope (now a separate account) by +21% from $518M in FY12 to $627M in FY13.  There were slight proposed increases in the Earth Sciences and Heliophysics accounts.  Earth Sciences would increase from $1.76B in FY12 to $1.78B in FY13 (+1.4%) and Heliophysics would increase from $620.5M in FY12 to $647M in FY13 (+4.3%).

The shift in proposed funding for these subaccounts represents a prioritization in the FY13 Budget Request under tough budget constraints.   The savings in the Planetary Science account stem from the cancellation of two future Mars satellite missions, and with the increases in future funding necessary to see a launch of the James Webb Space Telescope, the cancellation of such missions are difficult choices that must be made.

NIST Core

The President requested $708M in FY13 for NIST Core funding – up from $622M in FY12 and this would be a sizable increase of +13.8%.  The proposed 13.8% increase is reflected in the funding of the Construction of Research Facilities (CRF) and Scientific and Technical Research and Services (STRS).  CRF would receive an increase from $55M in FY12 to $60M in FY13 (+9.1%), and STRS would receive an increase from $567M in FY12 to $648M in FY13 (+14%).

The majority of the increased funding at NIST is meant to focus on advanced manufacturing research through the Advanced Manufacturing Technology Consortium (AMTC), a new program that would be funded at $21M.  The proposed funding of AMTC is in line with the Administration’s emphasis on creating high quality jobs in the U.S. through innovation.

NIH

Since the early 2000’s NIH has received ~50% of the total United States R&D budget and the President’s budget request of $31B in FY13 continues that trend.  The proposed increase is modest, however, at +1.1% over the $30.64B budget from FY12.

DOD 6.1 & 6.2

Continuing the trend from last year’s request, DoD’s overall R&D portfolio did not include a request for an increase.  The recent reductions are due, in part, to restrictions on defense spending as mandated by the BCA.  The basic research account would receive an increase from $2.10B in FY12 to $2.11B in FY13 (+0.2%) while the applied research account would see a decrease from $4.7B in FY12 down to $4.47B (-5%) in FY13.

Join Us at Contact Congress in Boston!

08 April Meeting - 13

If you’re attending the APS March Meeting in Boston next week, please stop by the Contact Congress booth.  This will be your chance to write to your Congressional delegation (that’s your two Senators and your Representative) about the importance of science funding to the nation.  We’ll be located in the Boston Convention Center, on Level 1 in the SE Lobby.  Check the maps in the back of your program, and you’ll find the spot.

As we keep hammering home, this year is especially bad for science.  With the sequestrations alone, the science budgets at NSF, NIST, DOE-SC, NIH, NASA, and DOD face serious cuts.  Yes, the President’s budget request was relatively good for science, but it’s Congress’ job to set the actual budget; Obama’s request is just a starting point.  And as we’ve said in the past, the job of citizens in our system is to tell their elected representatives what they want.

And that brings me back to Contact Congress.

During the meeting, it will ONLY take A MINUTE to sign the prepared letters we have, and you’ll get a fun sticker to put on your badge.  We’ll be open Monday to Wednesday 9a.m. to 6p.m., and Thursday 9a.m. to noon.

And again, we’ll be in the Boston Convention Center, Level 1, SE Lobby.  Hope to see you there!

*P.S.* If you can’t make it to Boston, you can always go to the APS Write Congress page and send your own message to your representatives.

NASA’s FY13 Budget Request Demonstrates Tough Choices

FL - Kennedy Space Center - NASA - 10-14-08

APS has been saying for a while that Fiscal Year 2013 (FY13) would be very difficult for a number of reasons (not the least of which are the coming sequestrations).

But the main reason is that government spending should be cut, according to the general view in Washington. Such a fiscal approach will require all parties in government to make some tough choices, and NASA’s budget request demonstrates those tough choices.  Read More »

APS Applauds President Obama’s Proposed Fiscal Year 2013 Budget

APS commends President Obama’s Fiscal Year 2013 budget, which prioritizes scientific research, spurs innovation and keeps the nation on a path toward economic prosperity.

APS is pleased that the President’s budget reflects the priorities of key scientific agencies that are crucial to our nation’s future competitiveness — the Department of Energy’s Office of Science, the National Science Foundation and the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Read more.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.